|
|
|
|
YOUR FEEDBACK
Did you read today's front page stories & breaking news?
SYS-CON.TV
|
TOP THREE LINKS YOU MUST CLICK ON iPhone News Desk My Take on the iPhone SDK
The contents of the SDK as well as the experiences that occur while using the SDK are confidential
By: Kevin Hoffman
Mar. 14, 2008 09:45 AM
So, to start with, I need to preface this blog post with a notice: The contents of the SDK as well as the experiences that occur while using the SDK are confidential. Yes, I am one of those crazy-weird people who read EULAs and license agreements. When you agree to installing the SDK, you agree to those terms. Anybody posting information about the innards of the SDK is violating the agreement and subject to assault by massive teams of rifle-toting SWAT guys. So, the opinions and information I post here will be based on information in the public domain, such as Steve Jobs' keynote and information you can find on Apple's website without logging in using your ADC or iPhone Developer credentials. So, here's what it looks like you can do with the SDK on the iPhone:
So, let's run this down again. When developing native applications for the iPhone, you get virtually unlimited access to the Unix subsystem and networking stack (though I've been told there's no VoIP on cell net, only WiFi. Similar, quite reasonable, limitations may also exist). You get to write your applications in Objective-C and use a Cocoa-like framework library. You get access to what is, in my opinion, the most powerful 2D graphics API available - Quartz. You get access to OpenGL on the iPhone for full 3D graphics and animation at what (from the demos) appears to be an incredibly good frame rate. Any app you make that doesn't violate the list of exceptions will be held, distributed, and sold by Apple. You get 70% of the cut. If you release an update to the application, iPhone users will be able to download an update to that application directly from their phones without even having to tether with iTunes!! When I first heard about the iPhone SDK, I was both excited and a little worried. You see, I've been using the .NET Compact Framework on and off for quite some time, and I did development for PalmOS before that (#(@)#!@# little-endian<->big-endian conversions can bite me!). Quite possibly one of the coolest things about the .NET Compact Framework is that you can create an application and deploy it to any Windows Mobile device. If you create an installer that runs on a Windows PC, it will use ActiveSync and get installed on the associated Windows Mobile device. I was worried that the iPhone SDK would create an experience that was more difficult for developers to get stuff on the phone. I couldn't have been more wrong, and I've never been happier to have one of my assumptions prove incorrect. Instead of developers building an installer and then figuring out how to host the installer and where to put it and how to charge for it, developers just give the single App file to apple, tell them about the app and how much to charge, and that's that. Better yet, iPhone users don't have to use their PCs to download and install an app and then tether up to install it. Using the App Store (scheduled in June as part of the iPhone OS 2.0 release), iPhone users will be able to browse, buy, download, and install applications all from their iPhone without ever having to tether or involve a PC. That folks, is what a mobile "digital lifestyle" device experience should be like. I can't wait until June to find out what kinds of amazingly cool stuff people are making for the iPhone and the iPod touch. I will predict, however, that people are going to find some insane things to do with the accelerometers and the Core Location services, as well as OpenGL ES. YOUR FEEDBACK
LATEST iPHONE STORIES
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
|
SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS MOST READ THIS WEEK BREAKING IPHONE NEWS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||