Apple's taken some heat lately for their decision to push Safari to anybody who runs their Apple Software Update utility. I didn't want Safari, but unless I opt out of it I'll get it. Now Sun and Google are doing the same thing with the Google Toolbar. It isn't enough that they allow you to opt-out.
Reader Feedback : Page 1 of 1
#6
Skip commented on the 23 May 2008
I administer over 300 computers at a school. I need to update Java regularly to keep applications some of our server side applications running. Google toolbar slows many of the dinosaur aged systems I can't afford to replace. Why can't Sun just include a switch to deselect Google when running the executable offline in silent mode. I have not been able to find any way to opt out of the installation when running it from a script.
#5
Chris commented on the 20 May 2008
Stop your whinning and uncheck it. Better yet totally remove Java from your computer!
#4
darted commented on the 28 Apr 2008
Well, as for multiples, sounds like an install problem. I have a machine that I have multiple copies of JDK and JRE installed over time (and some not removed for testing purposes) and only one updater runs. As for the opt out by default being what SHOULD be required - I agree wholeheartedly.
#3
Sun emp commented on the 25 Apr 2008
Even working for Sun.. I totally agree an detest this stupidness
#2
Paul Allen commented on the 25 Apr 2008
I hate to say it, but this functionality has been nothing new. This was introduced sometime in the later updates of the 1.5 JRE. This is nothing new for the industry either, install the latest version of flash and you'll find the same thing.
#1
JimBen commented on the 24 Apr 2008
I don't care who does it: Microsoft, Sun, Apple, Google, Real, Adobe, Roxio. Any software company that presumes to install background processes on my machine without explicitly begging for my permission earns my animosity, resentment and cynicism. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling, they are. Mozilla, you earn my highest respect and kudos for the class and elegance by which you handle the update process.
iPhone News Desk wrote:
Up to this point, the
iPhone has been a device
for gadget fanatics and
big spenders, while
shortcomings like the
price and lack of 3G have
limited the addressable
market considerably
NN wrote: Yes we should
have say in open source
platform but way I see it
Google and Adobe will do
according to own
propriety when it comes
to add features. I like
GWT but again very plain
UI with built in library
(third party limited not
many)
Adobe has to be one step
ahead ...
What? wrote: "The last
time I was this excited
about a new SDK was
probably when .NET 2.0
came out"
OK, that's the funniest
thing I think I've ever
read in one of these
articles. I didn't
realize how completely
sarcastic it was, but
then I imagined Lewis
Black reading it out ...
Brent Thompson wrote:
Many developers are now
working on software for
the iPhone and iPod
Touch. The intuitive
interface, high
resolution photos, high
memory capacity, and ease
of synchronization will
breathe new life into the
use of handheld computers
in practice. I have been ...